The ‘snoopgate’ controversy took a fresh twist on Tuesday with the woman architect and her father approaching the Supreme Court to immediately stall the Centre’s proposed judicial commission on the row and also scrap the existing two member commission constituted by the Gujarat government.
A bench of Justice Rajana Prakash Desai and Justice NV Ramana issued notice on the petition urging the top court to protect the household’s fundamental “to be able to privacy, While claiming the monitoring was done at their instance.
The bench did not pass any immediate stay order and fixed May 9 to hear the situation. It also requested the media not to publish the name of the petitioners.
“Why did you come forth with her name in the petition? we simply throwback nba jerseys
cannot gag the media but can only request them, The bench said in respond to the petitioners’ counsel, Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar’s plea to direct the media not to reveal his patient’s name.
The same court is also hearing suspended Gujarat cadre IAS officer Pradeep Sharma’s petition alleging the state administration harassed him as he had understanding the surveillance over the woman. He has challenged in order to register of criminal cases against him and has Chinese Wholesale Jerseys
sought CBI probe into the snoopgate controversy.
“In this crossfire between vested amuse, The petitioners as collateral damages are subjected to a violation of their fundamental rights day after day, investigate the woman architect’s petition.
Filed signifies of counsel Bina Madhavan, The petitioners asserted the family had requested for the security. about the other hand, the actual “Sinister and defamatory campaign initiated a policy of in electronic and print media by certain vested interests groups (With whom no petitioners) Are concerned ostensibly on to the ground of protecting the petitioners’ right to privacy, It reported.
This has resulted in tarnishing the family’s reputation, Forcing them to change their residence four times a long time ago one year. It was further submitted that the emails of the father and daughter have been hacked and scores of indecent calls were being received by the family from around the globe.
The monitoring, It integrated, Never breached their the law. “on the other hand, The petitioners have remained fortunate for the timely, Appropriate and adequate safety measures taken by the State Government considering the circumstances prevailing then, The petition said.
the national Commission for Women started a parallel inquiry and turned down the woman’s request to close it as the State Commission for Women had conducted a detailed probe into it, The petitioner stated.
“As portion of the said ongoing attempts, The petitioners were shocked to learn from newspapers published in responsible newspapers that the Central government is also choosing to constitute a commission of enquiry under the provisions of the Enquiries Act, The request said seeking a stay on any move by the Centre.